When writing a message to the log it would be great if we could have an option to capture the name of the microflow (or nanoflow) it came from. The name of the microflow is visible where there is a stack trace but not for handled appllication errors.
Obviously you can include the name in the log message text yourself but if the microflow is renamed it can easily get out of date.
This should be quite a simple change that would make it easier to make log messages more helpful when troubleshooting your app.
Adding on that great idea, maybe add the user name performing the action as well
Great Idea